Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMKsjrkC1ezSh5sva-onQmqJ4bQ0sUAU3PrYQbCq-Coiug@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Furthermore, what the XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE bit actually reports is just
> whether a backup operation is in progress, and I think we have now (or
> easily could) add reporting records to the WAL stream that tell when a
> backup starts or stops.  So external compression would still be possible
> if it kept a bit more state around.
>
> So: is there actually any such compression program out there?
> Would anybody really cry if this flag went away?

Yes, WAL records could be invented to mark the boundaries, so yes,
IMHO it is OK to make that flag go away.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lars Kanis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is anybody actually using XLR_BKP_REMOVABLE?