On 22 May 2012 13:52, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems pretty clear to me that making pg_upgrade responsible for
> emptying block zero is a non-starter. But I don't think that's a
> reason to throw out the design; I think it's a problem we can work
> around.
I like your design better as well *if* you can explain how we can get
to it. My proposal was a practical alternative that would allow the
idea to proceed.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services