Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMKPj744NdPx5nVs651esvJSh87rT7+76zrV_=vA6s8HBQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 25 January 2013 17:19, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> We
> could easily run across a system where pg_class order happens to be
> better than anything else we come up with.

I think you should read that back to yourself and see if you still
feel the word "easily" applies here.

I agree with Tom that its hard for almost any prioritisation not to be
better than we have now.

But also, we should keep it fairly simple to avoid introducing new
behaviour that defeats people with a highly tuned vacuum config.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Enabling Checksums
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks