Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMK=Es8kZLP-oHEfzrRLQmxjz6k66tGaFDSzcub4_TNASQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: logical decoding - GetOldestXmin
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 December 2012 20:03, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Does anybody have an opinion on the attached patches? Especially 0001, > which contains the procarray changes? > > It moves a computation of the sort of: > > result -= vacuum_defer_cleanup_age; > if (!TransactionIdIsNormal(result)) > result = FirstNormalTransactionId; > > inside ProcArrayLock. But I can't really imagine that to be relevant... I don't see why this is hard. Just make the lock acquisition/release conditional on another parameter. That way the only thing you'll be moving inside the lock is an if test on a constant boolean. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: