On 11 May 2012 15:14, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 11.05.2012 16:56, Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> On 11 May 2012 11:07, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> =A0wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if we should reserve a few of the lwlock "slots" for critical
>>> sections, to make this less likely to happen. Not only in this case, but
>>> in
>>> general. We haven't seen this problem often, but it would be quite
>>> trivial
>>> to reserve a few slots.
>>
>>
>> Why reserve them solely for critical sections?
>
>
> Because if you run out of lwlocks in a critical section, you get a PANIC.
Yes, but why reserve them solely for critical sections? If you have an
escape hatch you use it, always
--=20
=A0Simon Riggs=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 http:/=
/www.2ndQuadrant.com/
=A0PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services