Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJqHf5K0ERVhwX+DBBpb=c5bOVe-YWr+K=7NVHRwaTy=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> To me, it seems that you are applying a double standard.  You have
> twice attempted to insist that I do extra work to make major features
> that I worked on - unlogged tables and index-only scans - work in Hot
> Standby mode, despite the existence of significant technological
> obstacles.  But when it comes to your own feature, you simply state
> that it cannot be done, and therefore we need not do it.   Of course,
> this feature, like those, CAN be made to work.

Vitriol aside, If you would be so kind as to explain how it is
possible, as you claim, I'll look into making it work.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reducing bgwriter wakeups
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Future of our regular expression code