Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJTjOb7+qJsrRaTjZsWPOAw26_iXD5cqPm-_vz5nQGxDQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had to reply to query about usage VACUUM ANALYZE or ANALYZE. I
> expected so ANALYZE should be faster then VACUUM ANALYZE.

VACUUM ANALYZE scans the whole table sequentially.

ANALYZE accesses a random sample of data blocks. Random access is
slower than sequential access, so at some threshold of sample size and
sequential/random I/O speed ratio ANALYZE could become slower.

So it depends upon the hardware and the setting of stats_target.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE is faster than ANALYZE?
Следующее
От: Sandro Santilli
Дата:
Сообщение: [PATCH] typo fix