Re: Extra XLOG in Checkpoint for StandbySnapshot

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: Extra XLOG in Checkpoint for StandbySnapshot
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJLn1S72bC+B6B7fNV0a5=g+Cjj0g5AOCjnGoCBBBgLAA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Extra XLOG in Checkpoint for StandbySnapshot  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Ответы Re: Extra XLOG in Checkpoint for StandbySnapshot  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7 January 2013 12:39, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote:

> So We can modify to change this in function LogStandbySnapshot as below:
>                 running = GetRunningTransactionData();
>                 if (running->xcnt > 0)
>                         LogCurrentRunningXacts(running);
>
> So this check will make sure that if there is no operation happening i.e. no
> new running transaction, then no need to log running transaction snapshot
> and hence further checkpoint operations will be skipped.
>
> Let me know if I am missing something?

It's not the same test. The fact that nothing is running at that
moment is not the same thing as saying nothing at all has run since
last checkpoint.

If we skip the WAL record in the way you suggest, we'd be unable to
start quickly in some cases.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Extra XLOG in Checkpoint for StandbySnapshot
Следующее
От: "孟庆钟"
Дата:
Сообщение: A very small typo in the comment