Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nMJJ4s-CysTBiqXK0YaaPavHn_2McL-ETPXejMf7QdfmRQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts
Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> I just noticed that HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid is comparing Xmax as a TransactionId without verifying
whetherit is a multixact or not.  Since they advance separately, this could lead to bogus answers.  This probably needs
tobe fixed.  I didn't look into past releases to see if there's a live released bug here or not. 
>
>> I think the fix is simply to ignore the Xmax if the HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI bit is set.
>
>> Additionally I think it should check HEAP_XMAX_INVALID before reading the Xmax at all.
>
> If it's failing to even check XMAX_INVALID, surely it's completely
> broken?  Perhaps it assumes its caller has checked all this?

HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid() is only ever called when
HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns HEAPTUPLE_DEAD, which only happens
when HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI is not set.

I'll add an assert to check this and a comment to explain.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: HeapTupleHeaderAdvanceLatestRemovedXid doing the wrong thing with multixacts
Следующее
От: Chris Redekop
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Backup with rsync fails at pg_clog if under load