Re: Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore is very slow
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore is very slow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMJD4LS2=orsOOgU+sKapTmn3-_fmox_u5fjvnc7JjAUeA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming replication on 9.1-beta2 after pg_restore is very slow (David Hartveld <David.Hartveld@mendix.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, David Hartveld <David.Hartveld@mendix.com> wrote: > I've been looking at my log files on master and slave a bit better, after having set log_min_messages = debug5. I can seethat somehow the master and slave don't properly work together: the slave attempts to send some data ('sending write/flush/apply')(I'm assuming this is the slaves current location in the WAL?) and then 'terminates process due to administratorcommand', while the master is sending data ('write/flush/apply') (the next part of the WAL?), and then 'couldnot send data to the client: Connection reset by peer', after which the server process exits. I'm hoping this providesyou with more information on what is going on. Do point me in the right direction if you need me to investigate further.I have attached two pieces of the master and slave log files, which should correspond w.r.t. their interaction, whereyou can see the above behavior. Ah, so synchronous_standby_names is set on the standby. Please reset that so we are operating asynchronously, then rerun tests to see if that avoids the error. You'll probably need to fully re-generate the standby server before doing this. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: