Re: fast promotion and log_checkpoints
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fast promotion and log_checkpoints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+U5nMJ9hiqARzG0QF2E9HdM0pdQWoR4-rph5W02Fc0THMBkZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fast promotion and log_checkpoints (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fast promotion and log_checkpoints
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20 May 2013 20:06, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: >> It would be possible to redesign this with a special new reason, or we >> could just use "time" as the reason, or we could just leave it. >> >> Do nothing is easy, though so are the others, so we can choose >> anything we want. What do we want it to say? > > > I'm not sure. Perhaps we should print "(no flags)", so that it wouldn't look > like there's something missing in the log message. The reason text would still be absent, so it wouldn't really help the user interpret the log message correctly. I suggest we use RequestCheckpoint(CHECKPOINT_CAUSE_TIME) instead, since it is literally time for a checkpoint. --Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: