Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Дата
Msg-id CA+U5nM+CsgYaH6EfJTWy+YrEJG4Ygzp9Q5hCG3vvCBZeuGEGhA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that
> something's missing.

I'm quoting you completely out of context here, but yes, something is missing.

We can't credibly do one test on usage count in shared buffers and
then start talking about how buffer management is all wrong.

My own patch requires more test evidence before we can commit it,
which is why I hadn't published it before now. I'll endeavour to do
that now its on the table.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame