On 8 June 2012 09:14, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello, I will make this patch start again for this CF.
>
> The requirement for this patch is as follows.
>
> - What I want to get is similarity of the behaviors between
> master and (hot-)standby concerning checkpoint
> progression. Specifically, checkpoints for streaming
> replication running at the speed governed with
> checkpoint_segments. The work of this patch is avoiding to get
> unexpectedly large number of WAL segments stay on standby
> side. (Plus, increasing the chance to skip recovery-end
> checkpoint by my another patch.)
I think we need to be clearer about this:
I reject this patch and am moving to rejected on the CF manager.
The "increase chance to skip recovery end checkpoint" is completely
gone as a reason to do this (see other thread).
Plus the premise that we want more restartpoints is wrong, with
reasons explained by Heikki, in detail, months ago.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services