Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobyH58vz9noKmk5j-n=ZGttn_xL=k9OztLvYZRPYBCdsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c
Re: Missing PG_INT32_MIN in numutils.c |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While going through numutils.c I found the following thing:
> --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numutils.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ pg_ltoa(int32 value, char *a)
> * Avoid problems with the most negative integer not being representable
> * as a positive integer.
> */
> - if (value == (-2147483647 - 1))
> + if (value == PG_INT32_MIN)
> {
> memcpy(a, "-2147483648", 12);
> return;
> Attached is a patch. The interesting part is that pg_lltoa is not
> missing the check on PG_INT64_MIN.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: