Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmoby-gU1Uke+z87AJw5FPtdhzmWy=eaomH_4zXGck=jE0Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That leads me to wonder: Have you measured different, lower, number of
> buffer mapping locks? 128 locks is, if we'd as we should align them
> properly, 8KB of memory. Common L1 cache sizes are around 32k...

Amit has some results upthread showing 64 being good, but not as good
as 128.  I haven't verified that myself, but have no reason to doubt
it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Scaling shared buffer eviction