Re: Fast DSM segments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Fast DSM segments
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobwYH84_y6CMU8uJykt-1sygWByzzPyvLbmU_z610DbwA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Fast DSM segments  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Fast DSM segments  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 6:03 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> That all makes sense.  Now I'm wondering if I should use exactly that
> word in the GUC... dynamic_shared_memory_preallocate?

I tend to prefer verb-object rather than object-verb word ordering,
because that's how English normally works, but I realize this is not a
unanimous view.

It's a little strange because the fact of preallocating it makes it
not dynamic any more. I don't know what to do about that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melanie Plageman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomicoperations within spinlocks)