Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobw+PhNVciLesd-mQQ4As9D8L2-F7AiKqv465RhDkPf2Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The flinfo->fn_extra question, from me this time.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 5:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The FROM case could be improved perhaps, if somebody wanted to put
> time into it.  You'd still need to be prepared to build a tuplestore,
> in case of rescan or backwards fetch; but in principle you could return
> rows immediately while stashing them aside in a tuplestore.

But you could skip it if you could prove that no rescans or backward
fetches are possible for a particular node, something that we also
want for Gather, as discussed not long ago.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Take skip header out of a loop in COPY FROM
Следующее
От: Melanie Plageman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory Accounting