Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobqbeJ9iRQO4ym6OiHt71sSv2eai=01kOZjxhdof9K4Mw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Eager aggregation, take 3 (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Eager aggregation, take 3
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 3:52 AM Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > To avoid potential memory blowout risks from large partial aggregation > values, v18 avoids applying eager aggregation if any aggregate uses an > INTERNAL transition type, as this typically indicates a large internal > data structure (as in string_agg or array_agg). However, this also > excludes aggregates like avg(numeric) and sum(numeric), which are > actually safe to use with eager aggregation. > > What we really want to exclude are aggregate functions that can > produce large transition values by accumulating or concatenating input > rows. So I'm wondering if we could instead check the transfn_oid > directly and explicitly exclude only F_ARRAY_AGG_TRANSFN and > F_STRING_AGG_TRANSFN. We don't need to worry about json_agg, > jsonb_agg, or xmlagg, since they don't support partial aggregation > anyway. This strategy seems fairly unfriendly towards out-of-core code. Can you come up with something that allows the author of a SQL-callable function to include or exclude the function by a choice that is under their control, rather than hard-coding something in PostgreSQL itself? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: