Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoboHAtfydQxLGbx422nLN9227oe8AZ2Rjxznaf4ECfRKw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote:
> I know, but it doesn't feel right to "register" static functionality.

We do it elsewhere.  The overhead is pretty minimal compared to other
things we already do during startup, and avoiding the need for the
array to have a fixed-size seems worth it, IMHO.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch: avoid heavyweight locking on hash metapage
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: new --maintenance-db options