Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobmq0wvQzPXdONgnB5_UV2pRq+w9=ai=d9faJJuQHvovw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example
> pg_fdw_txn_resolver?
> I'm also fine to change the module and function name.

If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating
the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x".

To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all?Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver"
or
"fdw_transaction_manager"?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins