Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobmhdNqUjZh7CrNLTAok-A6vemMxZJZg_c_wuoM0SxGxA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> [ oom_score_adj business ]
>
>> Did we do anything about this?  Anyone else have an opinion on what
>> ought to be done?
>
> I held off doing anything because it didn't seem like we had consensus.
> OTOH, it may well be that it's not important enough to demand real
> consensus, and he who does the work gets to make the choices.

Half a loaf is better than none.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inserting heap tuples in bulk in COPY