Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobiJZSmYS7ieFTHaCS8kDWwfAVwE-BaLGcjGbdGax75Xg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] mat views stats  (Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> Certainly easier, but I don't think it'd be better. Matviews really aren't
> the same thing as tables. Off-hand (without reviewing the patch), update and
> delete counts certainly wouldn't make any sense. "Insert" counts might, in
> as much as it's how many rows have been added by refreshes. You'd want a
> refresh count too.

Regular REFRESH truncates the view and repopulates it, but REFRESH
CONCURRENTLY does inserts, updates, and deletes as needed to adjust
the contents.  So I think all the same counters that make sense for
regular tables are also sensible here.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [patch] reorder tablespaces in basebackup tar streamfor backup_label