Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmobi92_5_fepjhPC+wHVfXGY5_Ckz7PCdwrKg0bjz3+h_w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 6/24/15 3:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Meh. The relevant branches already exist, as you can disable it today.
>>
>> We could also just change the default in the back branches.
>
> One more argument for leaving everything alone.  If users don't like it,
> they can turn it off themselves.

I find it very hard to disagree with that perspective.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench - allow backslash-continuations in custom scripts
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?