Re: replication commands and log_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: replication commands and log_statements
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobbpoS3woHeDcF0kzeEZ3ZXTY-J7BCi7Sj0MtOgX_cfVQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: replication commands and log_statements  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: replication commands and log_statements  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think ideally it would have been better if we could have logged
> replication commands under separate log_level, but as still there
> is no consensus on extending log_statement and nobody is even
> willing to pursue, it seems okay to go ahead and log these under
> 'all' level.

I think the consensus is clearly for a separate GUC.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins
Следующее
От: Rahila Syed
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes