Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobaS7sOpFjwoVKREJWrpuca3RfOdtWTpUd40eO9+8+NdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > 0001- same as previous with some changes for freeing the shared memory stuff. > 0002- nodeBitmapHeapScan refactoring, this applies independently > 0003- actual parallel bitmap stuff applies on top of 0001 and 0002 0002 wasn't quite careful enough about the placement of #ifdef USE_PREFETCH, but otherwise looks OK. Committed after changing that and getting rid of the local variable prefetch_iterator, which seemed to be adding rather than removing complexity after this refactoring. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: