Re: Draft release notes complete

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Draft release notes complete
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobZBcLwh8cj2ggGzZ+5WAazKtDAGn-2=4iwcCx9g95UTA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Draft release notes complete  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Draft release notes complete  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>>> Then reviewers should be removed.
>>>
>>> I disagree.  We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to
>>> do more reviewing.  Giving credit is a big part of that.
>>
>> Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion?
>
> Hah, good point.  I'm disagreeing with the conclusion that reviewers
> should be removed, unless we're going to remove everyone *and* give them
> credit elsewhere.  Which I would also be in favor of, I'm just not able
> to do the work right now.

Well, the problem with the way it is right now is that we're giving
similar amounts of credit for very different amounts of contribution,
which IMHO is no good.  I think that putting a "Credits" section at
the bottom and listing contributors there would be a reasonable
solution; I also think that crediting people on a web page or in some
other place would be a fine solution.  What we have right now manages
to be both unfair and unreadable.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample