Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobYokvKzbFUF+HuA-kr=RJYAb49MxJJbXoYNEy4Rz-CgA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> I was assuming that we would have *both* per-operation and per-statement
> limits.  I can see reasons for having both, I can see why power users
> would want both, but it's going to be overwhelming to casual users.

I don't think so.  I think the fact that this is per-gather-node
rather than per-statement right now is basically a defect.  Once we
have a per-statement limit, I see no value in having the
per-gather-node setting.  So, yes, at that point, I would push to
rename the GUC.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Problem with dumping bloom extension
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Prepared statements and generic plans