On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:15 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Maybe. What I was pointing out is that this is SQL-standard syntax
> and there are SQL-standard semantics that it ought to be implementing.
> Probably those semantics match what you describe here, but we ought
> to dive into the spec and make sure before we spend a lot of effort.
> It's not quite clear to me whether the spec defines any particular
> unique key (identity) for the set of role authorizations.
I sort of thought http://postgr.es/m/3981966.1646429663@sss.pgh.pa.us
constituted a completed investigation of this sort. No?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com