Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobU=abmEFJD7JNM+vR9OwVkw9mtbe7HJsTZ2jBa2jz5xA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since:
>> commit f0e44751d7175fa3394da2c8f85e3ceb3cdbfe63
>> Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
>> Date:   Wed Dec 7 13:17:43 2016 -0500
>>
>>     Implement table partitioning.
>>
>> If I use psql compiled from 10devel to connect to a 9.6.1 server, then \d
>> fails:
>>
>> psql (10devel-f0e4475, server 9.6.1-16e7c02)
>> Type "help" for help.
>>
>>
>> # \d pgbench_accounts
>> ERROR:  column c.relpartbound does not exist
>> LINE 1: ...ELECT inhparent::pg_catalog.regclass, pg_get_expr(c.relpartb...
>>
>
> Looks like they forgot to adjust version check number in describe.c code.
>
> Attched patch fix it.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Nested Wait Events?
Следующее
От: Dmitry Ivanov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take