On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/02/2015 05:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> But I'm not sure I like the idea of adding a server dependency on
>>> the ability to exec pg_controldata. That seems like it could be
>>> unreliable at best, and a security vulnerability at worst.
>>
>> I hadn't been paying attention --- the proposed patch actually
>> depends on exec'ing pg_controldata? That's horrid! There is no
>> expectation that that's installed.
>
> No it doesn't. I'm confused :-/
No, I'm confused. Sorry. Somehow I misread your patch.
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company