On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On August 17, 2016 8:15:56 PM PDT, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>+ { /* pg_ctl command w path, properly quoted */
>>+ PQExpBuffer pg_ctl_path = createPQExpBuffer();
>>+ printfPQExpBuffer(pg_ctl_path, "%s%spg_ctl",
>>+ bin_dir,
>>+ (strlen(bin_dir) > 0) ? DIR_SEP : ""
>>+ );
>>+ appendShellString(start_db_cmd, pg_ctl_path->data);
>>+ destroyPQExpBuffer(pg_ctl_path);
>>+ }
>>
>>This is not really project-style to have an independent block. Usually
>>those are controlled by for, while or if.
>
> Besides the comment positioning I'd not say that that is against the usual style, there's a number of such blocks
already. Don't think it's necessarily needed here though...
Really? I'd remove such blocks before committing anything, or ask for
them to be removed, unless there were some special reason for having
them.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company