On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I think it does the contrary. The current mechanism is, in my opinion,
> downright dangerous:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160201235854.GO8743@awork2.anarazel.de
A sort of middle way would be to keep the secondary checkpoint around
but never try to replay from that point, or only if a specific flag is
provided.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers