Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomicoperations within spinlocks)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomicoperations within spinlocks)
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobQP3_9VOra+Bk08BZg+fyHB8hJT99rDOYQu7-S=Dfusg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: global barrier & atomics in signal handlers (Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Sure, but wouldn't making the SpinLockAcquire layer into static inlines be
> sufficient to address that point, with no need to touch s_lock.h at all?

I mean, wouldn't you then end up with a bunch of 1-line functions
where you can step into the function but not through whatever
individual things it does?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonpath versus NaN
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: jsonpath versus NaN