Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobPs8_-5cYA55AepLQOnUjpfrc=KLhETxNmWuMF32j40g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 1:46 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Trying to move this along, where would be a good place to define
> OPENSSL_API_COMPAT?  The only place that's shared between frontend and
> backend code is c.h.  The attached patch does it that way.

So, if we go this way, does that mean that we're not going to pursue
removing dependencies on the deprecated interfaces? I wonder if we
really ought to be doing that too, with preprocessor conditionals.
Otherwise, aren't we putting ourselves in an uncomfortable situation
when the deprecated stuff eventually goes away upstream?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit
Следующее
От: Juan José Santamaría Flecha
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows