Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobNLmRW-9FX0ajoaq69WYCncuoAafBzMWhHnjGfw+P8Gw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status  (konstantin knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 2:10 AM, konstantin knizhnik
<k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> txid_status() also not always be able to return status of transaction (if wraparound happen).
> But it is still considered as one of the key features of 10 (transaction traceability...).

Not by me.  It's a feature, though, for sure.  It's also a LOT more
stable than what you're proposing.  Even on a busy system, it takes a
while to go through 200 million transactions; you probably can't
realistically do that in under an hour, and you'll probably raise the
200 million transaction limit if you're anywhere close to that rate.
In practice, you'll almost always be able to look up transactions for
several days, and often weeks or months.  With what you're proposing
here, the information could disappear nearly instantly.  I can't see
how that works out to a usable feature.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Gustafsson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Push down more UPDATEs/DELETEs in postgres_fdw
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_prepared_xact_status