Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobJJwKeBON4H2kb3pnh0-mtJ_MuzOvYCeOgh0w2k_7TCw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:05 PM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think you feel quite strongly about not having the code select a
> random matching index, so if we want to stick to that rule, then we'll
> need to create a set of new leaf indexes rather than select a random
> one.

I feel quite strongly about it *in the context of pg_dump*.  Outside
of that scenario, I'm happy to go with whatever behavior you and
others think will satisfy the POLA.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.