On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> If I recall correctly, Tom pointed out a while back that the comment
> justifying the lockless read of the VM bit was not correct (or at least
> not complete).
>
> I rewrote it, but it was part of a patch that was not accepted. Attached
> is the comment patch only.
Looks reasonable to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company