Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Progressive explain |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobGZseEpTeyhzstFs6rVKaB-_CfiC7gTuvz=QhWc=aR=w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Progressive explain (Rafael Thofehrn Castro <rafaelthca@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 3:59 PM Rafael Thofehrn Castro <rafaelthca@gmail.com> wrote: > > True, although thinking about it more, they're not being sent to the > > same place. auto_explain goes to the log, and this goes to a view. > > What about something like this: > > progressive_explain = on | off > > progressive_explain_inteval = 5s > > I'm still more inclined to use: > > progressive_explain = off | explain | analyze > progressive_explain_interval = any millisecond greater than a min threshold > (currently 10ms). It doesn't make sense to be dumping the instrumented plan > every 1ms for example, IMHO. I still have trouble understanding what that means. Is the interval irrelevant except when progressive_explain = analyze? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: