Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmobFKOU44zAAjqpa1BSQ7kmdaGzDj4_kPEq_7ZbZ0fbeww@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:14 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Here's a *draft* patch series for removing all use of SHM_QUEUE, and
> subsequently removing SHM_QUEUE.

+1 for that idea.

But color me skeptical of what Thomas described as the "incidental
constification".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Improve heavyweight locks instead of building new lock managers?
Следующее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multiple FPI_FOR_HINT for the same block during killing btreeindex items