Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobEmJgJd3474Hf3=RbDCg7TKJU9OPt7fP3YxCa0XP7m_A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed
via SQL [review]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > On 6/7/13 12:14 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: >> I will change the patch as per below syntax if there are no objections: >> >> ALTER SYSTEM SET configuration_parameter {TO | =} {value, | 'value'}; > > I do like using ALTER SYSTEM in general, but now that I think about it, > the 9.3 feature to create global settings in pg_db_role_setting would > also have been a candidate for exactly that same syntax if it had been > available. In fact, if we do add ALTER SYSTEM, it might make sense to > recast that feature into that syntax. > > It might be clearer to do something like ALTER SYSTEM SET EXTERNAL FILE > or something like that. It's only a small syntax change, so don't worry > about it too much, but let's keep thinking about it. I think that anything we want to add should either go before SET or after the value, such as: ALTER SYSTEM SET configuration_parameter = 'value' IN FILE 'myconf.conf'; ALTER SYSTEM CONFIGURATION FILE SET configuration_parameter = 'file'; ALTER SYSTEM CONFIGURATION FILE 'myconf.conf' SET configuration_parameter = 'file'; I agree we shouldn't back ourselves into a syntactic corner. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: