On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:42 AM James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yesterday I'd replied [1] to Justin's proposal for this WRT
> incremental sort and expressed my opinion that including both
> unnecessarily (i.e., including disk when an in-memory sort was used)
> is undesirable and confusing and leads to shortcuts I believe to be
> bad habits when using the data programmatically.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company