Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob=sKD=Ag3TXQ+b7wWiJaoYaV-AgEddQYCxMNMCqmz=bA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > Also, I'd be inclined to reject system-provided objects by checking
> > for OID >= 16384 rather than hard-wiring assumptions about things
> > being in pg_catalog or not.
>
> To me, oid>=16384 seems more hard-wired than namespace!='pg_catalog'.

Extensions can be installed into pg_catalog, but they can't get
low-numbered OIDs.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade (12->14) fails on aggregate