Re: On disable_cost
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On disable_cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob=BuOyoiUtGYs=XVWTiXpDKDQwRTXtckp+Bysic2sT7g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On disable_cost (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: On disable_cost
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 4:42 AM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > 1. The "disabled nodes" are always displayed. > I'd be happier if it were only shown for COSTS ON, but I think it > would be best if they were only shown with VERBOSE ON. > > After all, the messages are pretty verbose... I agree that the messages are more verbose than what we did before (add a large value to the cost). But I would have thought it wouldn't matter much because most of the time nothing will be disabled. And I would think if you get a plan that has some nodes disabled, you would want to know about that. I actually thought it was rather nice that this system lets you show the disabled-nodes information even when COSTS OFF. Regression tests need to suppress costs because it can vary by platform, but the count of disabled nodes is stable enough to display. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: