Re: Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob7+KOgNoRVuW6XWQPb_p3Aa0zY+AHYHyzO3X8cuq4saQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: Probable bug with CreateFakeRelcacheEntry (now with reproducible test case)  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> This bug seems particularly troublesome because the right fix would be
> to include the relpersistence in the WAL records that need it. But that
> can't be backported (right?).

No, because if a WAL record was written at all, then by definition the
table is RELPERSISTENCE_PERMANENT.  So there's probably a localized
fix.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6704: ALTER EXTENSION postgis SET SCHEMA leaves dangling relations
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #6704: ALTER EXTENSION postgis SET SCHEMA leaves dangling relations