Re: Why so few built-in range types?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Why so few built-in range types?
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob4xcZ_Hp9tF9YoPLxfPR2CnfqBdGy2etCL0K40GUJOuA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why so few built-in range types?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Ответы Re: Why so few built-in range types?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> I don't have any particular care about if cidr has indexing support or
> not.  I'm certainly not *against* it, except insofar as it encourages
> use of a data type that really could probably be better (by being more
> like ip4r..).

Not that you're biased or anything!  :-p

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inlining comparators as a performance optimisation