On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:34 AM Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > And then you have to decide what to do about other background
> > transactions.
>
> Not count them if they're implementation details; otherwise count them.
> For example, IMO autovacuum transactions should definitely be counted
> (as one transaction, even if they run parallel vacuum).
Hmm, interesting. autovacuum isn't an implementation detail?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company