Re: Parallel Append implementation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Parallel Append implementation
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob3iQFVikFhd5k8EcsCDgmZuMTFgkSXONx0jeYvhW4dbQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I'm afraid this is too late for v10 - do you agree?

Yeah, I think so.  The benefit of this will be a lot more once we get
partitionwise join and partitionwise aggregate working, but that
probably won't happen for this release, or at best in limited cases.
And while we might not agree on exactly what work this patch still
needs, I think it does still need some work.  I've moved this to the
next CommitFest.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplesort_gettuple_common() and *should_free argument
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: background sessions