Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmob0sD3BGo46ZXK4hJw=2NDco10Zsx=rzTMxVXY0kHRvxg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-05-10 09:50:03 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> while ((src = (RewriteMappingFile *) hash_seq_search(&seq_status)) != NULL)
>> {
>> if (FileSync(src->vfd, WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_REWRITE_SYNC) != 0)
>> - ereport(ERROR,
>> + ereport(PANIC,
>> (errcode_for_file_access(),
>> errmsg("could not fsync file \"%s\": %m", src->path)));
>
> To me this (and the other callers) doesn't quite look right. First, I
> think we should probably be a bit more restrictive about when PANIC
> out. It seems like we should PANIC on ENOSPC and EIO, but possibly not
> others. Secondly, I think we should centralize the error handling. It
> seems likely that we'll acrue some platform specific workarounds, and I
> don't want to copy that knowledge everywhere.
Maybe something like:
ereport(promote_eio_to_panic(ERROR), ...)
?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: