Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob-3jWw32EVmGZaNLGHAyditYpjundsT8E9ziro65iQsA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 2PC files are created using RecreateTwoPhaseFile() in two places currently:
> - at replay on a XLOG_XACT_PREPARE record.
> - At checkpoint with CheckPointTwoPhase().
>
> Now RecreateTwoPhaseFile() is careful to call pg_fsync() to be sure
> that the 2PC files find their way into disk. But one piece is missing:
> the parent directory pg_twophase is not fsync'd. At replay this is
> more sensitive if there is a PREPARE record followed by a checkpoint
> record. If there is a power failure after the checkpoint completes
> there is a risk to lose 2PC status files here.
>
> It seems to me that we really should have CheckPointTwoPhase() call
> fsync() on pg_twophase to be sure that no files are lost here. There
> is no point to do this operation in RecreateTwoPhaseFile() as if there
> are many 2PC transactions to replay performance would be impacted, and
> we don't care about the durability of those files until a checkpoint
> moves the redo pointer. I have drafted the patch attached to address
> this issue.
>
> I am adding that as well to the next CF for consideration.

It's pretty stupid that operating systems don't guarantee that calling
pg_fsync() on the file, the file will also be visible in the parent
directory.  There's not much use case for wanting to make sure that
the file will have the correct contents but not caring whether it's
there at all.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins