Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept
Дата
Msg-id CA+Tgmob+kYuTs4ZN26ZySYRMhuFCjK_OnVY8iTZHPdn7Ro2iYg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept  (Ivan Kartyshov <i.kartyshov@postgrespro.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Ivan Kartyshov
<i.kartyshov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Hello. I made some bugfixes and rewrite the patch.

I don't think it's a good idea to deliberately leave the state of the
standby different from the state of the  master on the theory that it
won't matter.  I feel like that's something that's likely to come back
to bite us.

Giving LockAcquireExtended() an argument that causes some
AccessExclusiveLocks not all to be logged also seems pretty ugly,
especially because there are no comments whatsoever explaining the
rationale.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Patch: restrict pg_rewind to whitelisted directories
Следующее
От: Raúl Marín Rodríguez
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] pow support for pgbench